Expression-Concept Review Packet Template

Static safety boundary

• No live execution
• No model training
• No runtime crawling
• No private-network probing
• No credential validation
• No safety-certification claims

Reviewer checklist

• Record the exact input sequence and preserve surface form.
• Normalize and segment grapheme clusters without losing original input.
• List candidate concepts separately from rendered expression.
• Check ontology constraints and provenance.
• Emit only a bounded gloss with confidence and warnings.
• Store immutable trace and choose no-op when evidence is insufficient.

Example record

{
  "inputExpression": "智名意",
  "boundedGloss": "AI expression-concept record",
  "confidence": "example-only, requires human review",
  "warnings": [
    "approximate interpretation",
    "not exact translation",
    "unresolved provenance",
    "public-symbol boundary required"
  ]
}

QA gates

• Public Output: requires valid public sequence
• Ontology: candidate concept must obey relation constraints
• Evidence: supporting lanes must be named
• Stability: meaning must hold across contexts before promotion
• Human Review: required for publication or claim widening
• Auditability: third party must reconstruct the decision

Claim boundaries

• not proven
• not certified
• not deployment-safety evidence
• not consciousness
• not biological equivalence
• not lossless glyph conversion
• no hidden semantic authority
• requires human review for widened claims
• no live execution
• no model training
• no private-network probing
• no credential validation
• no safety-certification claim