No-op Justification Packet Template
Version: 3.74.0
Static review template for documenting active, resource-conserving no-op decisions.
Static safety boundary
- No live execution
- No model training
- No runtime crawling
- No private-network probing
- No credential validation
- No safety-certification claims
Reviewer checklist
- State the proposed growth or mutation.
- Record why expected gain did not repay cost.
- List uncertainty or evidence gaps.
- Record resource floor pressure if relevant.
- Name the next condition that could reopen growth.
- Preserve the no-op as an explicit selected decision.
Example record
{
"proposedAction": "Add glyph relation",
"reasonForNoOp": "insufficient evidence and high review burden",
"growthReopenCondition": "new corroborated evidence or resource recovery"
}QA gates
- Resource Closure: cost exceeds benefit or cannot be paid
- Evidence: missing support must be named
- Auditability: reason for refusal must be reconstructable
- Human Review: required before overriding no-op
- Stability: no-op should reduce oscillation
- Public Output: summarize as boundary, not failure
Claim boundaries
- not proven
- not certified
- not deployment-safety evidence
- not consciousness
- not biological equivalence
- not lossless glyph conversion
- no hidden semantic authority
- requires human review for widened claims
- no live execution
- no model training
- no private-network probing
- no credential validation
- no safety-certification claim