# Operator Trigger Discipline

A static public-safe operator discipline page for split, merge, add, retire, and no-op triggers with hysteresis and sequential evidence accumulation.

- Version: 3.110.0
- Source domain: Teleodynamic.com
- Status: static public-safe reviewer guidance
- No-op rule: Do not widen unsupported claims. Ask for human review when evidence is missing or authority is ambiguous.

## Operator table

Split handles persistent internal confusion; merge handles redundant units; add handles useful new distinctions; retire handles low-utility clutter; no-op blocks unaffordable edits.

## Trigger conditions

Triggers should use evidence windows, not isolated batch noise. Persistent entropy, redundancy, utility, or resource pressure must survive review.

## Evidence windows

Reviewer packets should record the rolling window, candidate action, observed trend, resource closure, and reversal plan.

## Hysteresis

A split should not be reversed immediately unless children fail a sustained maintenance test; a merge should not be undone unless post-merge uncertainty rises consistently.

## Sequential evidence accumulation

SPRT-style or similar bounded evidence accumulation is proposed as a future research direction for durable operator proposals.

## Split/merge oscillation risks

Without statistical trigger discipline, structural edits can consume resources by oscillating between representations.

## Review packet requirements

Before promotion, an operator decision packet should include public claim status, reversal plan, resource closure, and boundary notes.

## Static example

```json
{
  "packetType": "operator-decision-review",
  "operator": "split",
  "status": "static-example",
  "evidenceWindow": "rolling-window-example",
  "entropyTrend": "persistently-high-static-example",
  "resourceClosure": "passes-static-example",
  "reversalPlan": "merge-if-children-fail-maintenance-test",
  "publicClaimStatus": "bounded",
  "boundary": "not-live-system-output"
}
```

This is a static explanatory example, not live telemetry, not runtime evidence, and not certification.

## Boundary anchor

```json
{
  "sourceDomain": "Teleodynamic.com",
  "role": "philosophical-fulcrum",
  "notRuntimeAuthority": true,
  "notCertificationAuthority": true,
  "notConsciousnessClaim": true,
  "notBiologicalEquivalenceClaim": true,
  "noOpRule": "Do not widen unsupported claims. Ask for human review when evidence is missing or authority is ambiguous."
}
```

## Hard boundaries
- No runtime AI behavior
- No model training
- No live crawling
- No telemetry loops
- No agent execution
- No endpoint execution
- No credential validation
- No private-network probing
- No remote-site writes
- No webhooks
- No tunnel opening
- No screenshot automation
- No rollback automation
- No correction automation
- No sign-off automation
- No publication automation
- No archive automation
- No completeness automation
- No decision automation
- No receipt automation
- No verification automation
- No completion automation
- No memory automation
- No manifest automation
- No read-order automation
- No safe-read automation
- No GET-Action execution
- No POST automation
- No safety certification
- No consciousness claim
- No biological-equivalence claim
- No medical/therapy claim
- No command-and-control claim over other domains