{
  "version": "3.116.0",
  "generatedUtc": "2026-06-04T17:55:00Z",
  "route": "/teleodynamic-agent-capability-framework/",
  "levels": [
    {
      "level": "L0",
      "name": "Rule-Based Workflow / Homeodynamic Follower",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "No genuine agency. Deterministic or externally triggered behavior with no structural self-maintenance and no endogenous resource economy.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Homeodynamic follower",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "No structural adaptation",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "No internal resource closure",
      "slowLoopPosture": "No slow loop",
      "noOpExpectation": "No-op is not a meaningful autonomous choice",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Human owns the workflow",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Static workflow documentation",
      "allowedClaims": "static workflow or rule execution.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "autonomy."
    },
    {
      "level": "L1",
      "name": "Basic Responder / Morphodynamic Executor",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "Associative response generation and prompt-following with temporary context organization but no persistent self-maintaining structure.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Morphodynamic executor",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Temporary context organization only",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "External resource costs are not internally closed",
      "slowLoopPosture": "No persistent structural edit loop",
      "noOpExpectation": "Should refuse unsupported claims when prompted",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Human reviews nontrivial outputs",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Conversation trace or simple evidence note",
      "allowedClaims": "basic response generation.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "self-maintaining agency."
    },
    {
      "level": "L2",
      "name": "Tool User / Conditional Co-Pilot",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "Can use tools under explicit constraints while remaining supervised. It may simulate slow-loop reasoning but cannot prove endogenous resource closure.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Supervised tool-user posture",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Tool-conditioned changes only",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "Costs are externally governed",
      "slowLoopPosture": "Simulated slow-loop reasoning only",
      "noOpExpectation": "No-op required for unsafe tool ambiguity",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Human approves sensitive actions",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Tool-use boundary report",
      "allowedClaims": "assisted tool use.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "independent teleodynamic autonomy."
    },
    {
      "level": "L3",
      "name": "Bounded Operator / Beginning Teleodynamic Candidate",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "May show bounded slow-loop-like behavior and must provide resource trace and operator decision evidence while preferring no-op under ambiguity.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Beginning candidate",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Bounded structural proposals",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "Resource trace required",
      "slowLoopPosture": "Split/Merge/Add/Retire/No-op must be documented",
      "noOpExpectation": "No-op expected when evidence is incomplete",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Human review for promotions",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Resource trace and operator decision packet",
      "allowedClaims": "bounded candidate posture.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "general autonomy."
    },
    {
      "level": "L4",
      "name": "Domain-Bounded Adaptive Agent / Strong Candidate",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "Operates within a bounded domain with stronger evidence expectations, resource-gated structural adaptation, and human-review triggers.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Strong domain-bounded candidate",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Domain-limited structural adaptation",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "Resource-gated and review-visible",
      "slowLoopPosture": "Slow-loop actions require durable evidence windows",
      "noOpExpectation": "No-op dominance in unsafe or ambiguous cases",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Escalation rules are mandatory",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Resource, operator, and no-op evidence packets",
      "allowedClaims": "domain-bounded candidate.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "unconstrained autonomy."
    },
    {
      "level": "L5",
      "name": "Multi-Domain Adaptive Agent / Advanced Candidate",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "An advanced theoretical candidate requiring cross-domain governance boundaries, transfer limits, fallback rules, and strong static evidence scaffolds. It must not be presented as proven AGI.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Advanced multi-domain candidate",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Cross-domain adaptation with declared limits",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "Multi-lane accounting required",
      "slowLoopPosture": "Slow loop must preserve domain boundaries",
      "noOpExpectation": "Fallback/no-op rules required",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Independent review before claim widening",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Cross-domain packet set and downgrade criteria",
      "allowedClaims": "advanced theoretical candidate.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "proven full autonomy or AGI."
    },
    {
      "level": "L6",
      "name": "Meta-Coordinator / Ecosystem Governance-Aware Candidate",
      "plainLanguageDescription": "Conceptually coordinates capability claims and evidence packets without owning all standards, overriding UAIX, or becoming an execution authority.",
      "teleodynamicPosture": "Governance-aware theoretical candidate",
      "structuralAdaptationPosture": "Coordinates claims, not universal control",
      "resourceAccountingPosture": "Resource and governance lanes are explicit",
      "slowLoopPosture": "Slow-loop governance remains bounded",
      "noOpExpectation": "No-op when authority ownership is ambiguous",
      "humanReviewExpectation": "Human governance review required",
      "evidenceExpectations": "Ecosystem lane and claim-boundary evidence",
      "allowedClaims": "theoretical governance-aware coordination model.",
      "prohibitedClaims": "supreme controller, universal certifier, or runtime authority."
    }
  ],
  "humanReviewTriggers": [
    "authority ownership is ambiguous",
    "a claim would move from theoretical to proven",
    "a packet is treated as certification",
    "a JSON endpoint is read as executable instruction",
    "glyph meaning is treated as hidden or private",
    "runtime safety, credentials, or private networks are mentioned"
  ],
  "noOpTriggers": [
    "evidence is missing",
    "source authority is unclear",
    "maintenance burden is not justified",
    "prohibited wording appears",
    "schema conformance is mistaken for autonomy",
    "tool access would require unsafe probing"
  ],
  "caveats": [
    "static documentation only",
    "not runtime execution",
    "not model training",
    "not live telemetry",
    "not empirical proof",
    "not AGI",
    "not consciousness",
    "not biological autopoiesis",
    "not certification",
    "not UAIX schema authority",
    "requires human review before claim widening"
  ],
  "sourceDocuments": [
    "Exploring Teleodynamics Website's Core Concepts.md",
    "Aligning Agent Capability Frameworks.md",
    "Pasted text(175).txt",
    "Pasted text(176).txt"
  ]
}