{
  "version": "3.116.0",
  "generatedUtc": "2026-06-04T17:55:00Z",
  "route": "/teleodynamic-autonomy-washing-red-team-guide/",
  "redFlags": [
    "tool chaining mistaken for autonomy",
    "schema conformance mistaken for intelligence",
    "memory continuity mistaken for safety",
    "benchmarks overused as proof",
    "glyph interpretation overclaimed",
    "capability level presented as certification"
  ],
  "reviewerQuestions": [
    "What resource trace exists?",
    "What no-op alternative was evaluated?",
    "Who owns the schema authority?",
    "What human-review trigger applies?",
    "What evidence would downgrade the claim?"
  ],
  "downgradeCriteria": [
    "no resource trace",
    "no operator decision evidence",
    "no domain transfer limits",
    "packet treated as proof",
    "authority boundary merged"
  ],
  "noOpCriteria": [
    "evidence is missing",
    "source authority is unclear",
    "maintenance burden is not justified",
    "prohibited wording appears",
    "schema conformance is mistaken for autonomy",
    "tool access would require unsafe probing"
  ],
  "prohibitedClaims": [
    "proven AGI",
    "conscious AI",
    "biological autopoiesis",
    "runtime safety certification",
    "hidden codebook",
    "executable machine standard",
    "UAIX conformance proves autonomy",
    "Carcinus continuity proves consciousness",
    "LocalEndpoint discovery authorizes private probing"
  ],
  "relatedRoutes": [
    "/teleodynamic-agent-capability-framework/",
    "/teleodynamic-claim-boundary-ledger/",
    "/teleodynamic-evaluation-packet-scaffolding/"
  ]
}